AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE
AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE
Automatic exposure is based on the theory that
people are often exposed to a media environment while doing other things. Donohew, Nair, & Finn (1984): media users'
cognitive
systems pay attention as needed, with attention
levels varying over time. "Most media exposure is carried out in a nearly
mindless state". TV viewing, and
radio use may be habitual or ritualistic.
For instance, this theory says that when you do homework with the radio
on, you may selectively perceive songs and mentally "tune out"
commercials.
Exposure to mass communication may not always be highly
deliberate or purposeful. Many times people seem to be making their way through
the mass communication environment while on a kind of “automatic pilot”
(Donohew, Nair, & Finn, 1984). Common everyday examples of this phenomenon
include people working at their desks with the radio on in the background, or
washing dishes while also giving some attention to the television news.
The following description of the process of automatic
exposure is drawn from Donohew, Nair, and Finn (1984). In general, the
cognitive system may be ready at any given time to devote whatever amount of
attention is appropriate to a given task. If there is attention that is left
over, the system may use the leftover attention to daydream or solve problems.
But if a change in the stimulus movement, color, loudness suggests that more
attention may be appropriate, the system can switch very quickly to a more
alert state in which it may use its full processing capacities. This view
suggests that much use of mass communication might involve a low level of
attention, and, in fact, might be appropriately labeled ritualistic or
habitual. With this low level of attention operating, much of our selection of
particular mass communication messages (the decision to read a particular news
story, for instance) might be guided by very minor cues suggesting the
pleasantness or unpleasantness of being exposed to a particular message.
The notion of automatic exposure reminds us that much
selection of mass communication might not be for the purposes of reducing
uncertainty, protecting our attitudes, or carrying out a type of surveillance
function.
A great deal of exposure to mass communication is
apparently carried out in a nearly mindless state, where the intention is to
seek mildly pleasant stimuli, and past experience, with the same similar
content becomes a strong determinant.
Comments
Post a Comment